Page 14 of 21

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:02 pm
by msellan
Thanks Moggy, that's good to know. I hadn't heard about the "back porch" issue until I started reading through these forums again. Not a day goes by on here without learning something new. :) I also still don't know enough about the different ULAs in circulation to know which ones have the issue and which ones don't (same goes for the bug issue in the ROM - how to find out that info?).

But alas, sadly, I only have an old B&W analog CRT television to use with all my ZXs. So it can only mean that my original Zeddy is just plain broke.

Best,

-mark

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:42 pm
by Lardo Boffin
Fwapp wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2017 4:22 pm
You be careful though, Lardo, 6 months from now, you'll open a cupboard and wonder why you have so many ZX81's! :lol:

It does get addictive :)
Addictive? Nope! It's only two months later and I have 7! Oh wait...

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:54 pm
by 1024MAK
Need to buy some more to catch up with me :lol:

<Although I appear to have more Zeddy PCBs than cases :shock: >

Mark

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:41 pm
by Lardo Boffin
1024MAK wrote: Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:54 pm Need to buy some more to catch up with me :lol:

<Although I appear to have more Zeddy PCBs than cases :shock: >

Mark
In my defence I have not been doing this long! But fully intend not to go crazy with this... :roll:

I have a 1:1 ratio of PCBs to cases and in fact 6 of them are even boxed! Although 2 of the boxes are far from brilliant...

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 12:01 pm
by Lardo Boffin
The last of my recent eBay madness arrived today (finally...) and is a very nice condition issue one, as below:-

IMG_5724.JPG
(2.46 MiB) Downloaded 315 times
IMG_5725.JPG
(2.28 MiB) Downloaded 315 times

Check out the screen output! A bit dark but very well defined and solid as a rock! I wonder if this one would be usable with RF if a later ULA was put in?

IMG_5723.JPG
(3.8 MiB) Downloaded 315 times
Lardo

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 2:48 pm
by Moggy
Niiiice. :D

Another clean example and four different chip manufacturers, so full house!

Judging by the picture Lardo I don't see why the later ULA wouldn't work seeing as the only thing lacking at the moment is brightness. :D

Now step away from ebay and give the rest of us a chance. :lol:

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 8:51 pm
by Fwapp
Nice Zeddy that one, Lardo - bet it's a 01 batch on the bottom of the 2C184E ;) so one of the first of these types of ULA. A chap from NZ sent me a pic of a 8127 2C158E ULA, also on a cream PCB, helps define the transistion from 2C158E to 2C183E nicely.

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:01 pm
by Fwapp
PokeMon wrote: Sat Mar 25, 2017 4:30 pm In general for me it looks a bit like a chinese (or philippine) copy. :shock:
See the distance, line position and torsion of each single letter.
Looks crazy, nearly hand branded.

Bildschirmfoto 2017-03-25 um 16.28.34.png
Lots of ZX Spectrum ULA's with similar markings, Ferranti had a fab plant over there. Generally considered to be a bit less robust than the UK made ULA's which tended to carry the Ferranti logo. Basically - it's OK :)

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:40 pm
by Lardo Boffin
Well I bought another one... I saw the soft spongy feet and thought it looks interesting. It's a kludge fix (I assume) issue one! Nice. It works as far as I have tested it - most keys and it produces a dark output which is just about legible.

IMG_5995.JPG
(2.56 MiB) Downloaded 277 times
IMG_5996.JPG
(2.2 MiB) Downloaded 277 times
The underside has what can best be described as 'frosting'. The board is a bit hazy except near the edge connector and solder points. It looks deliberate rather than age related?

Lardo

Re: "Different" ZX81's

Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 11:42 am
by Fwapp
Wooo - nice!! The kludge fix ones are really nice to have in a collection. It amazes me that they could fix a software bug in the ROM by plonking hardware on the CPU - amazingly clever (at least from my point of view!)